Este PAYASO Nunca a venido a Puerto Rico (Que yo sepa) y le encanta hacer billetes publicando libros para contradecir lo que las personas honestas atestiguan haber visto. Que Fácil es así. Yo llevo investigando estos casos del Chupacabras desde sus comienzos en el 1995 y jamas he visto a este patán en ninguna de mis investigaciones. Fíjense como le gusta poner portadas misteriosas y llenarse la boca con un tema que nunca ha investigado seriamente. Este tonto se atreve a decir que lo que la Sra. Madeline Tolentino vio frente a su casa a plena luz del día fue una mentira y que lo saco de la película Species. Nunca a entrevistado a Madeline frente a frente ni a ninguno de los testigos. No se como este tipo de anormales (porque no quiero decir otra palabra ) pueden existir. Yo no tengo nada contra los escépticos. Es bueno y saludable cierto grado de escepticismo para poner a prueba la verdad. Pero yo pienso que no se puede hablar de lo que nunca se ha investigado. Yo invito a cualquiera que dude sobre estas cosas que si quieren pescado, hay que mojarse el rabo. Aquí no hacen falta investigadores de escritorio e internet como este. Venga, métanse en el campo y cuando vea todos esos animales despedazados, mutilados y sin sangre atrévase a decirme que son perros.
This CLOWN never to come to Puerto Rico (that I know) and loves to publishing books ticket to contradict what honest people reportedly witnessed. That is so easy. I’ve been investigating these cases the Chupacabras since its inception in 1995 and I have never seen this jerk in any of my research. Notice how he likes to put covers mysterious and filled the mouth with a subject that has never seriously investigated. This fool dares to say what Mrs. Madeline Tolentino was outside his house in broad daylight was a lie and that it out of the movie Species. Madeline never interviewed face to face or any of the witnesses. No abnormal as such (because I will not say another word) might exist. I have nothing against the skeptics. It’s good and healthy degree of skepticism to test the truth. But I think one can not speak of what has never been investigated. I invite anyone who doubts about these things if you want to fish, you have to get wet tail. Here no need for desktop and internet researchers like this. Come métanse in the field and when you see all those animals butchered, mutilated, bloodless dare to tell me that they are dogs.
Note Blog Administrator
Those who were actually involved in animal research at the beginning of this, we know very well what they have seen the many witnesses have seen and described by many years since they started these in the mid 90’s in Puerto Rico, as well’m not sure that these people who claim to be expert in the field do not know where it was that originated the first cases were in the central mountain town in Orocovis Puerto Rico and later moved to Canovanas, I’m really not sure where it originated the name and who was who put or baptism with the name of chupacabras, see if these people who are experts in these media leaving Discovery, history channel and national Geographic know the origin of the name? I am 100% sure that they do not know and will not know, because no one of these desktop investigators have had trouble to come to Puerto Rico and interview the real researchers who were involved in these cases, the true witnesses and present witnesses most recent cases in Guayama Puerto Rico. these characters that appear on some of these channels venture to say that a quadruped as a dog, wolf, fox, or any animal pretended with canines is the chupacabra, and recently have tried to push in the media of a dog of Mexican origin long snout is a chupacabra, when what many witnesses in Puerto Rico what they describe is far to be a simple quadruped or sick mangy dog you see in these marketing mediums cable or satellite tv. Many times trying to naive to witness what you have witnessed, who fantasize or invent fantastic stories, but I’m told the state police have seen this creature, and religious leaders who have been silent witnesses of this entity pass in front of them in their yards from their home or on the road, due to the religious mentality in fact blame the devil or demon things, but this is already another solvent dollars, senators and politicians have been witnesses, but silent, but these cases we have investigated whether, Who is here the researcher desktop? He who sits in front of a camera to speculate and say a number of stupid things without going to the place of origin, or that you really investigate and finds the testimony and goes to the countryside to look for evidence for a base? There are people who are paid to spread lies, disinformation in the medium and thus create division and manipulation of real information to false. When you have the view of the real researchers Puerto Rico that we are the pioneers in the early animal mutilations nationwide in really describe the anomalous body, even in the United States of America do not even know what the hell is killing and mutilating cattle from the 70s, but here in Puerto Rico we have the sketch of the suspect has been described by thousands of people on the island, for common people, state and municipal police, political, religious. The next time these big productions have to talk about animal mutilations and the chupacabras should seek to Puerto Rico researchers know very well that the stories and cases, and not seek to charlatans who seek fame only 5 minutes and that any senseless brutality.